A brokerage posting, questioned line by line
Say a posting describes a 70/30 split, a monthly team meeting requirement, company-provided leads from the brokerage's website, and a mentorship structure under a team lead for the first year. The session doesn't open with a generic real estate question.
It opens with something built from that text: how comfortable the candidate is converting cold, office-provided leads rather than warm referrals from their own network, what they'd want to know about how the team lead's mentorship actually works day to day, how they'd handle being one of several agents working the same lead pool.
A candidate looking at a different posting, one offering a higher split with no leads and full independence instead, would hear a session built around that posting's own terms, not this one's.
What gets covered
Expect questions pulled directly from the listed terms: the commission split named, whether a desk fee or transaction fee applies, whether leads come from the brokerage or are expected to come from the agent's own sphere, and any team or mentorship structure described.
If the posting mentions a required CRM, a minimum production standard, or a specific niche like luxury or new construction, that gets folded into the questions too. Nothing about the session is invented outside the text supplied, so a listing that barely touches lead source keeps that part of the interview thin while the terms it does spell out get the deeper treatment.
Scoring
How scoring applies here
The Technical dimension here is graded against what the posting actually offers, not against real estate knowledge in the abstract, so an answer that shows strong sphere-of-influence lead generation when the posting is built entirely around office-provided leads still needs to connect back to what that specific arrangement requires.
Calibration floors and caps apply the same way they do on every Intervieux interview type, which keeps a fluent-sounding answer that dodges the posting's specific terms from outscoring a shorter one that actually engages with them. The written reasoning attached to each dimension reflects how directly the answers addressed that posting's own split, lead source, and structure.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use a brokerage posting I found somewhere other than Intervieux?
Yes. The session works from whatever posting text is pasted in, whether that's a listing on the Intervieux job board or one found on a brokerage's own recruiting page, and builds its questions from that specific text either way.
Will it ask about the exact commission split named in the posting?
Yes, if the posting states one. A listing naming a 70/30 split with a desk fee produces questions grounded in that specific arrangement rather than a generic reference to commission.
What if the posting doesn't say much about lead source?
The interview only works with what's actually on the page. A listing that stays quiet on lead source keeps that thread light too, while whatever terms the posting does spell out get weighted more heavily instead.
How is this different from the general interview type for a real estate agent?
General runs the same standard question set for anyone, no document involved. This type reads a specific brokerage posting first and builds its questions from that listing's actual split, lead source, and structure.
Related pages
Practice against the exact brokerage deal you're considering
Paste in a real brokerage posting and get questioned on its specific split, lead source, and team structure before the real conversation.