The same interview type, two very different postings
A wire-service posting for a breaking-news reporter and a corporate communications manager posting from a mid-size company can both get pasted into this interview type, and the questions that come back barely resemble each other.
The wire-service posting usually names deadline speed, AP style, and multi-source verification directly in its requirements, so the session leans on how fast a lead gets written and how a fact gets checked before it runs.
The corporate posting tends to name executive messaging, internal communications, and crisis protocol instead, so the same interview type asks about drafting a message on an executive's behalf or briefing a leadership team before a public statement goes out. Neither session is generic.
Both are reading the specific language of the posting that got pasted in.
How the posting's own language becomes the questions
A skill or tool named directly in the posting, an AP Stylebook reference, a content management system, a media monitoring platform, turns into a spoken question about how it gets used day to day rather than a checkbox. A reporting line in the posting, who the role answers to, an editor or a communications director, shapes how the session asks about handling feedback or a rewrite request.
A journalism posting that lists clips or published work as a requirement produces questions about a specific piece of writing; a PR or corporate posting that lists a media list or a client roster produces questions about maintaining relationships instead.
Scoring
How scoring reads a posting-specific session
Technical reads differently here than it would for an engineering interview: it reflects how directly an answer addresses the specific tools, platforms, or standards the posting names, rather than any coding knowledge.
Calibration floors and caps guard specifically against an answer that sounds confident about a named requirement without actually addressing it, so a fluent non-answer to a posting's specific ask should not outscore a shorter, accurate one.
Behavioral questions get asked in the same posting-grounded way, phrased around whatever kind of pressure the listing implies, deadline pressure for a reporter posting, an executive relationship for a comms manager posting, and the STAR-structure penalty applies to how that pressure actually got handled, not just how it started.
Frequently asked questions
Does this work with a posting from outside the Intervieux job board?
Yes. Any posting text can be pasted in, whether it's a wire-service listing, a PR agency posting, or a corporate communications opening found somewhere else entirely, not just a listing already stored on the Intervieux job board. The interview builds its questions from whatever description is supplied.
Will a journalism posting and a PR posting produce the same kind of questions?
No. The questions come from each posting's own language, so a reporter listing that names deadline speed and verification standards produces very different questions than a comms listing that names executive messaging, media relations, or crisis protocol instead, even when both postings share a similar job title.
Why pick this over a general practice session?
General asks the standard round of questions that doesn't depend on any specific posting. This type reads an actual job description and questions a candidate against its named requirements directly, closer to how that specific employer would actually interview for the role.
Can I use this to prepare before I've applied to the posting?
Yes. Pasting in a posting's text works whether an application has already gone in or not, which makes it useful for preparing ahead of applying as well as after, once a posting is known but before any interview is scheduled.
Related pages
Practice against the posting you actually want
Paste in a real journalism, PR, or corporate communications listing and get questioned on what that specific posting names, before the employer asks the same thing for real.