# Intervieux vs Interviewer.AI

Intervieux is a candidate-first platform where job seekers practice AI interviews privately and then apply for real jobs through a built-in job board. Interviewer.AI is an employer- and university-facing screening product that businesses and schools pay for to run one-way video interviews on applicants at scale.

A candidate signs up for Intervieux directly, owns the account, and controls when they practice. Interviewer.AI's core buyer is different: a hiring team or an admissions office pays a monthly fee for interview credits, and most candidates only ever see the product because a company or school sent them a link. Interviewer.AI does also sell a mock-interview product aimed at students and career switchers, marketed through universities and bootcamps, so it isn't purely a business-to-business tool. But its business is selling screening infrastructure to organizations, not building an ongoing job search around the practice itself. That distinction shows up in the small details: an Interviewer.AI candidate account exists because someone else paid for it, while an Intervieux candidate account exists because the candidate opened it, and it keeps working the same way from a first practice run through an actual job offer.

## The honest verdict

If you're a job seeker who wants to practice privately before real interviews and then apply straight into a job board that plugs those practice reps into an actual hiring pipeline, Intervieux is built around that use case and Interviewer.AI is not; a candidate typically only meets Interviewer.AI because a specific employer or school already uses it. If you're the one buying, and what you actually need is a screening tool that drops into an ATS you already run, with credit-based pricing and multi-language reach for high-volume hiring, Interviewer.AI is the more direct fit. Intervieux's employer side assumes a hiring team is willing to run its pipeline inside Intervieux's own ATS rather than alongside one it already owns, and for an organization mid-way through an ATS rollout, that's a real reason to pick Interviewer.AI instead.

## Who each tool is actually built for

Interviewer.AI is for talent acquisition teams doing volume hiring, staffing agencies, retail and hospitality chains, or graduate recruiting programs, plus university career-services and admissions offices that want a branded portal to run and score one-way video interviews without live recruiter time. Candidates encounter it when invited by one of those organizations, or directly if their school has bought the student mock-interview product. Intervieux is for the individual job seeker: someone prepping for a first internship interview, an engineer changing industries, or anyone who wants a private practice run before a real screening interview. Employers use Intervieux too, but its own applicant tracking system sits underneath the job board, so a candidate's practice history and their real interview live inside one product rather than a purchased add-on bolted onto someone else's tracker. A campus career center weighing both tools is really weighing two different jobs: Interviewer.AI sells the school a screening and mock-interview portal it administers, while Intervieux gives an individual student their own account that keeps working after graduation, independent of whether the school ever renews a license.

## Side-by-side

| Dimension | Intervieux | Interviewer ai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary buyer | Individual candidate signs up directly | Employer or university purchases a seat license and interview credits |
| Interview format | 7 interview types, including technical, resume-based and salary negotiation, one ElevenLabs voice agent per type | One-way asynchronous video responses to preset questions; avatar-based interviewer with follow-ups on the Enterprise tier |
| Pricing model | Pro $39/month or $33/month billed annually; job board free | Essential $199/month, Professional $399/month, Enterprise custom, billed to the organization per interview credit |
| Candidate cost | Free to browse jobs and apply; Pro is a paid layer for extra self-practice | Free to the candidate when invited by an employer; the student mock-interview product is billed to the school, not the student |
| Scoring | 5 dimensions, 0-10, written reasoning, calibration floors, penalty system | AI response-relevancy scoring; detailed score breakdowns and fraud checks on Professional and above |
| Real hiring pipeline | Practice feeds a live job board; one-click apply leads to the employer's real AI screening interview | Responses go into the employer's Interviewer.AI dashboard for shortlisting; no consumer job board attached |
| ATS relationship | Full built-in ATS is the product itself | Plugs into a company's existing ATS as an add-on screening step |
| Developer access | Published ATS REST API (13 scopes, OpenAPI spec) plus a hosted remote MCP server at app.intervieux.ai/mcp with OAuth 2.1, PKCE and dynamic client registration, so a Claude or ChatGPT connector can operate the ATS directly | API access exists for its own Greenhouse and Zapier integrations, provisioned by a sales representative, but no public developer docs, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server are published |

## Pricing and who actually pays

Interviewer.AI's published pricing starts with an Essential plan at $199 a month for 50 interview credits, 20-minute interviews, 3 job posts, and 15 user seats, then a Professional plan at $399 a month for 120 credits, 30-minute interviews, transcripts and fraud checks, with a custom Enterprise tier above that (interviewer.ai/pricing, checked 2026-08-08). That bill goes to the employer or school. A 14-day free trial and credit rollover soften the cost for the buyer, not the candidate. Intervieux reverses who pays: the job board is free for candidates, and the paid layer is $39 a month, or $33 a month on the annual plan, for a candidate who wants more of their own structured practice, not for the employer running the screening. A company hiring through Intervieux gets access by request rather than buying interview credits up front. Neither company publishes a per-candidate cost for the employer side beyond that request-based model, so a hiring team comparing the two on price alone still has to ask each company directly what a given hiring volume would run.

## The interview experience itself

Interviewer.AI's core product records a candidate answering fixed prompts on video, one way, with no back-and-forth. The avatar-based interviewer, available on the Enterprise tier, adds dynamic follow-up questions to that format. Intervieux runs seven distinct interview types, each with its own conversational voice agent, spanning general and behavioral rounds, technical challenges with real code execution in five languages, resume-based questions pulled from the candidate's own document, and salary-negotiation practice for either a new offer or an internal raise. A candidate also picks the interview style, formal, semi-formal or friendly, and one of twelve interviewer personalities before starting, a choice that makes sense for a candidate's own practice and has no obvious use inside an employer-purchased screening tool. The difference comes down to who the conversation is designed for. Interviewer.AI's format is built to be consistent across hundreds of applicants answering the same prompt, which is exactly what a hiring team scoring volume applicants at once needs. Intervieux's format is built to be different every time a single candidate opens it, since the point is building that candidate's own skill across a range of question types rather than producing directly comparable recordings for a reviewer.

## Technical practice, one clear difference

Interviewer.AI's public feature list doesn't describe a dedicated coding or technical-challenge format; its structure is built around video responses to prompts rather than executing code. Intervieux's technical interview type runs real code execution through Piston, across JavaScript, Python, Java and several other languages, with hidden and visible test cases and adjustable difficulty. For a candidate whose next interview is a coding round rather than a behavioral one, that's a concrete capability gap between the two products, not a matter of framing.

## Where the two products actually meet: hiring

Both companies sell to employers, but the shape of that sale differs. Interviewer.AI is a screening layer a hiring team plugs into whatever applicant tracker it already runs, with most of the workflow sitting inside Interviewer.AI's own dashboard. Intervieux's employer side is a full applicant tracking system in its own right: seven canonical pipeline stages, a rules engine that tags and routes candidates the moment their AI interview finishes, and a job board that draws its own applicant flow instead of depending on an employer's existing careers page. A hiring team that wants to keep its current ATS and only swap in a better screening step gets a more direct match from Interviewer.AI's plug-in model than from Intervieux's all-in-one approach. Intervieux also publishes a REST API covering jobs, applications, pipeline, scheduling, documents and talent search across 13 scopes, with an OpenAPI spec at /api/v1/, plus a hosted remote MCP server at app.intervieux.ai/mcp using OAuth 2.1, PKCE and dynamic client registration, so a tool like Claude or ChatGPT can connect to a company's own ATS through a real consent screen rather than a custom integration. Interviewer.AI's own integrations, including a Greenhouse connector and a Zapier integration, run on an API key issued by an Interviewer.AI representative rather than a self-serve developer portal, and no public API docs, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server are listed on its site as of this check. That gap matters for an engineering-heavy hiring team that wants to script or automate parts of screening on its own terms rather than requesting each integration through a vendor contact.

## Scoring and what a candidate gets back

Interviewer.AI shows candidates and employers an AI relevancy score, with Professional-tier customers getting a fuller score breakdown and a fraud check on the recording. Intervieux always grades five dimensions, Overall, Communication, Technical, Behavioral and Cultural Fit, with written reasoning behind every number, calibration floors so scores can't drift toward flattery over repeated use, and a penalty system that dings issues like an abrupt ending or an unstructured answer to a behavioral question. After a completed Intervieux interview, a candidate can also ask plain-language follow-up questions about their own transcript and report, a feature built for the person being interviewed rather than the company reviewing the tape. Intervieux also tracks a candidate's scores against the platform average over time, with per-dimension trend lines and achievement markers like completing every practice type, so a candidate can see whether last week's weak spot has actually improved, something a one-off employer screening report was never designed to show.

## Sources

- Interviewer.AI's Essential plan is $199/month for 50 interview credits, 20-minute interview duration, 3 job posts/month, and 15 user licenses. ([source](https://interviewer.ai/pricing)) (checked 2026-08-08)
- Interviewer.AI's Professional plan is $399/month for 120 credits, 30-minute interviews, 5 job posts/month, 25 licenses, plus transcripts, fraud checks and detailed score breakdowns. ([source](https://interviewer.ai/pricing)) (checked 2026-08-08)
- Interviewer.AI offers a custom Enterprise plan with conversational AI avatars, dynamic interview flows and a dedicated account manager. ([source](https://interviewer.ai/pricing)) (checked 2026-08-08)
- Interviewer.AI serves employers doing volume hiring and educational institutions running admissions or mock-interview practice, and offers 'AI Mock Interviews' for students, job seekers and career switchers, used by universities and bootcamps. ([source](https://interviewer.ai/)) (checked 2026-08-08)
- Interviewer.AI's core product is asynchronous one-way video interviews with AI scoring, resume screening, ATS integration and support for 10+ languages. ([source](https://interviewer.ai/)) (checked 2026-08-08)
- Interviewer.AI's Greenhouse integration requires an API key issued by an Interviewer.AI representative, set up per Greenhouse's own support documentation; Interviewer.AI's homepage also references a Zapier integration; no public developer API docs, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server were found on interviewer.ai as of this check. ([source](https://support.greenhouse.io/hc/en-us/articles/360035063912-Interviewer-AI-integration)) (checked 2026-08-08)

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Interviewer.AI the same kind of product as Intervieux?

No. Interviewer.AI is sold to employers and schools to run one-way video screening interviews on applicants, billed by interview credit. Intervieux is signed up for directly by the candidate, who practices AI interviews privately, then applies to real jobs through a built-in job board where the employer's own AI interview becomes the actual hiring signal.

### Can I use Interviewer.AI to practice on my own for free?

Interviewer.AI's mock-interview product for students exists, but it's sold through universities, bootcamps and training programs rather than directly to an individual candidate. Intervieux's job board is free to browse and apply through, and its structured self-practice interviews are part of the $39-a-month Pro plan, or $33 a month billed annually.

### Does Intervieux integrate with the ATS my company already uses?

Intervieux ships its own applicant tracking system rather than plugging into an outside one; pipeline, rules engine and scheduling all run inside Intervieux. If your hiring team specifically wants to keep its current ATS and add a screening layer on top, Interviewer.AI's plug-in model is built for that instead.

### Which one has deeper scoring on a candidate's answers?

Intervieux always scores five dimensions, Overall, Communication, Technical, Behavioral and Cultural Fit, with written reasoning and a penalty system for issues like a missing STAR structure. Interviewer.AI's relevancy scoring and full score breakdowns are strongest on its Professional and Enterprise tiers, which employers pay $399 a month and up for.

### Does Intervieux offer coding or technical interview practice like Interviewer.AI does?

Interviewer.AI's public feature set is built around video responses to prompts, not a coding format. Intervieux's technical interview type runs real code in JavaScript, Python, Java and several other languages through actual execution, with hidden and visible test cases, so a candidate preparing for a coding round gets a closer rehearsal on Intervieux.

## Related pages

- [Browse open jobs](/jobs)
- [Common questions about Intervieux](/faq)

## Practice privately, then apply for real

Intervieux's job board is free to browse and apply through, and every application can lead to a real AI screening interview instead of a resume sitting in a queue.

Start practicing free: https://www.intervieux.ai/register · Hire with Intervieux: https://www.intervieux.ai/employers/signup